3 min readUpdated: May 25, 2026 10:58 PM IST
Months after he was threatened by right-wing groups for taking a stand against the harassment of an elderly Muslim shopkeeper, Deepak Kumar, now popularly known as “Mohammad Deepak”, faces the prospect of losing the gym that he has been running.
On January 26, Deepak (38) stood up to a group of men who were harassing a 70-year-old Muslim shopkeeper, who suffers from Parkinson’s disease. The group were demanding that the elderly man drop the word “Baba” from his shop’s name. When Deepak intervened, people from the group asked him his name, to which he replied, “Mohammad Deepak”. A video of the incident went viral, thrusting Deepak into the limelight but also bringing unwanted attention. On January 31, several members of the Bajrang Dal gathered to confront Deepak, but were restrained by the police.
Following the incidents, reports emerged that several people had stopped showing up at Deepak’s gym — with membership falling from 150 to just 15. Subsequently, there was an effort by several people, including those from the legal fraternity, to rally behind “Mohammad Deepak”. Eventually, he said, the membership went up again to nearly 70 people a day.
However, the “economic boycott” stemming from social isolation and communal frenzy had a significant impact, leaving Kumar unable to meet the monthly rent of Rs 40,000 for the space from which he runs the gym. The instalments to be paid for a loan he took to build a house have also been affected.
Deepak told The Indian Express that the owner of the building where his gym is housed has asked him to vacate after he failed to pay rent for four months. “I have not been able to consistently pay the rent. However, things were looking up as almost 70 people had started coming in every day. He implied that he did not want to rent it out to me because I ‘stood up for Muslims’,” Deepak said.
Although a group of lawyers from the Supreme Court had lent him a hand by offering to pay annual membership fees for the gym, Deepak said, “It required more to keep the gym running”.
Story continues below this ad
“When the membership drive was active, I used the amount for the EMIs and my child’s fees, and I could not pay the rent regularly. Now he has threatened me with eviction,” said Deepak.
In March, Deepak had moved the Uttarakhand High Court, seeking the quashing of the FIR against him. Observing that to cooperate with the investigation, ‘Mohammad’ Deepak should not “indulge in sending messages or videos on social media”, the Uttarakhand High Court disposed of his petition by stating that it was essential for a fair and transparent investigation.
