Architects and design experts have raised concerns about US President Donald Trump’s controversial plan to build a new White House ballroom, warning that the proposal contains major design flaws and risks altering one of America’s most historic buildings.The ballroom addition is estimated to cost between $300 million and $400 million. It is slated to replace the East Wing of the White House and has drawn criticism from professionals who say the design is impractical and disruptive.
Several architectural critics pointed to features in the plans they say make little sense. They noted “fake windows on the north side,” interior columns that block views within the space, staircases that lead nowhere, and an overly large rooftop area.These flaws were mentioned in a detailed report published by The New York Times, which examined mock‑ups of the ballroom ahead of a key vote by the National Capital Planning Commission scheduled for April 2. The commission reviews major changes to federal property, including the White House grounds.
The ballroom will be more than three times the size of the main White House residence, disrupting the historic symmetry of the presidential home, say experts. “The hurried reviews, with construction cranes already swivelling above the White House grounds, are an abrupt departure from how new monuments, museums and even modest renovations have been designed and refined in the capital for decades,” the Times report said, citing architectural experts.The East Wing was demolished in October 2025 to make way for the project, a move that sparked its own controversy because it occurred before full planning approval had been secured.Public opposition has been strong. According to a review of comments submitted to planning bodies, about 98 per cent of more than 32,000 public responses opposed the ballroom plan, describing it as overly large and inappropriate for the historic site.Among the voices of dissent, Kate Schwennsen, a former national president of the American Institute of Architects, said the design was so flawed that students submitting similar work would have failed academically.Trump’s supporters in the planning commission and the MAGA base have pushed the project forward, and the White House has said the ballroom will be privately funded using donors’ money. Still, preservation groups have raised legal challenges, arguing that proper review and congressional approval were bypassed.
Poll
Do you think modern changes should be allowed to historic buildings?
White House responds
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt pushed back against people calling out the “flawed” design of Trump’s ballroom. She critcised the NYT report in a post on X and said: “The New York Times had three random people who have “studied fine arts,” “long written about urban planning,” and never built anything to write an article criticizing the new White House ballroom.”She added: “President Trump and his lead architect have built world-class buildings around the world, and they are ensuring the People’s House finally has a beautiful ballroom that’s been needed for decades — at no expense to the taxpayer.”
